Which sentence pattern does the sentence, "Samuel ran to the store," follow?

The sentence "Samuel ran to the store" follows the S-V-O pattern because it consists of a subject (Samuel), a verb (ran), and it implies an object related to the action, even though the prepositional phrase "to the store" does not serve as a direct object in the traditional sense.

In this case, the subject "Samuel" is the doer of the action, and "ran" is the action performed. While the phrase "to the store" indicates where he went, it does not serve as a direct object that receives the action of the verb. Instead, it complements the verb by providing additional information about the action.

This understanding illustrates that even though "to the store" does not fit the conventional object definition, the structure of the sentence aligns more closely with the S-V combination in English sentences. The emphasis is on the subject performing a verb, and although it doesn't follow the classic S-V-O where an object is directly acted upon, the verb's action and the subject's relationship capture the essence of that pattern.

Thus, recognizing the sentence structure confirms that this is indeed an example of an S-V construction with a complementary phrase that enhances the meaning of the verb rather than serving a direct object